Banner Online News

By Chukwudi Abiandu

The unfolding saga over the restoration of Aniocha North II State Constituency in Delta State has become a troubling test of Nigeria’s commitment to the rule of law. At the centre of this controversy is the disturbing reluctance of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to obey a clear and binding judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria. In any democracy that respects constitutional order, such a situation should never arise.

Yet for years, the people of communities such as Idumuje-Unor, Idumuje-Ugboko, Nkwu-Nzu, Ugboba, Idumuogo, Ugbodu, Ubulubu, Anioma and Ogodo in Aniocha North Local Government Area have remained effectively disenfranchised because the constituency meant to represent them has not been operationalised despite court orders. Their offence? Simply demanding fair and lawful representation.

For more than a decade, these communities have knocked on the doors of INEC seeking justice and administrative correction. Their demand has always been straightforward: the restoration of Aniocha North II Constituency to ensure equitable representation in the Delta State House of Assembly. Instead of addressing this legitimate grievance, the electoral body adopted a posture of bureaucratic inertia.

When administrative appeals yielded nothing, the people sought judicial redress. In 2017, the Court of Appeal sitting in Benin ruled clearly that the constituency must be restored and elections conducted. Rather than respect that judgment, INEC chose the path of resistance and appealed. The case eventually reached the apex court.

On November 29, 2019, the Supreme Court of Nigeria dismissed INEC’s appeal and affirmed the Court of Appeal’s decision. By every constitutional standard, that ruling settled the matter conclusively. Under Nigeria’s legal framework, a Supreme Court judgment is final, binding, and not subject to administrative discretion. But astonishingly, implementation stalled.

Years after the judgment, the constituency remains unrealised, leaving thousands of citizens without proper representation in the legislative process. This is not just administrative delay; it is democratic exclusion.

The implication is profound. Without the constituency being operational, the affected communities cannot elect a representative who will speak for them in the Delta State House of Assembly. Their developmental priorities, infrastructural needs, and policy concerns remain largely unheard within the state’s legislative framework. In essence, they have been politically silenced.

It is therefore deeply significant that the matter has now drawn decisive intervention from the Nigerian Senate. During plenary, the Senate unanimously directed INEC to implement the Supreme Court ruling and ensure that Aniocha North II State Constituency is fully restored ahead of the 2027 State House of Assembly elections. The resolution followed a compelling motion moved by Ned Nwoko, the senator representing Delta North. In presenting the motion, Senator Nwoko emphasized the constitutional obligation to obey judicial decisions and warned against allowing bureaucratic resistance to undermine democratic rights.

The Senate’s decision was adopted through a voice vote, reflecting a rare unanimity among lawmakers on the urgency of correcting what has become a long-standing democratic injustice.

The intervention of the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, further reinforced the gravity of the matter. He made it unequivocally clear that a Supreme Court judgment must be implemented, stressing that the restored constituency should be reflected in the 2027 Delta State House of Assembly elections once the current Assembly’s tenure ends. His position echoed what should be an obvious constitutional truth: no agency of government is above the law.

Indeed, the Senate went further by urging the House of Representatives to concur with its resolution and communicate with INEC to expedite compliance. This underscores the urgency of restoring the democratic rights of the affected communities.

Yet, the bigger question remains: why should it take legislative intervention to compel a federal agency to obey the Supreme Court?This troubling situation raises serious concerns about institutional accountability.

INEC, as the body entrusted with safeguarding Nigeria’s electoral integrity, must not become an example of disregard for the rule of law. If the commission begins to treat court judgments as optional, it risks eroding public trust in the very democratic system it is meant to protect. The continued delay in implementing the Supreme Court ruling is unacceptable and must end immediately.

The electoral body should move without further hesitation to establish Aniocha North II State Constituency and incorporate it into preparations for future elections. Every additional day of delay prolongs the disenfranchisement of thousands of citizens who deserve full participation in the democratic process.

In this regard, Senator Ned Nwoko deserves commendation for demonstrating genuine commitment to the interests of his constituents. At a time when many politicians are content with symbolic gestures, his persistence in bringing this issue before the Senate reflects responsible and effective representation. It is precisely the kind of advocacy constituents expect from those elected to represent them.

However, if INEC still chooses to ignore the Supreme Court’s directive despite the Senate’s resolution, the affected communities should not hesitate to return to the courts to seek enforcement through contempt proceedings. No public official or institution has the constitutional right to disobey a lawful order of the Supreme Court.

Where such defiance occurs, the judiciary must assert its authority. Those responsible for persistent non-compliance should be compelled to answer for contempt of court. The rule of law cannot survive if institutions are allowed to disregard judicial authority without consequence.

Ultimately, this issue transcends the boundaries of Aniocha North. It is about whether Nigeria’s democratic institutions truly respect the constitution.

The Supreme Court has spoken. The Senate has reminded. The people have waited long enough. INEC must act now.