Banner Online News

 

For six agonizing days, the nation has watched helplessly as 39 students and seven teachers remain in captivity; one teacher already beheaded, his body still unrecovered. Military jets circle the forests daily, a police helicopter sits on standby, yet the kidnappers breathe freely with their hostages. This raises a singular, terrifying question: what on earth has happened to Nigeria’s security architecture?

The May 15 attack on Ahoro Esinele community in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State was not a sophisticated military ambush. It was armed men on motorcycles storming three schools, herding children and teachers into the bushes while the country’s vast security apparatus, the same one that consumes billions of naira annually stood by, reactive and paralyzed .

Two weeks later, the victims remain in an unknown location, the beheaded teacher’s family is begging the president to help recover his remains for burial, and the government is reportedly negotiating ransom payments .

This is not an isolated failure. Since January 2026 alone, over 1,000 Nigerians have been abducted across the country. Not in the distant past. Not in the years of Boko Haram’s peak. In the last five months .

But let’s stop staring at the statistics and start asking the questions that no one in power wants to hear.

Question 1: If This Were America, Would These Kidnappers Still Be Breathing?

Let’s conduct a thought experiment that exposes the rot in our system. Imagine armed gunmen in Montana storm a rural school, abduct 46 Americans, and drag them into the wilderness. What follows would not be a debate about ransom or a governor tweeting that “our thoughts are with you.”

What would follow is a 72-hour high-stakes rescue operation combining satellite imagery, signals intelligence, drones, and special forces, exactly what the United States demonstrated in April 2026 when it extracted a downed F-15 weapons officer from deep inside hostile Iranian territory .

The Americans didn’t negotiate with the Iranians. They didn’t deploy a single helicopter to sit on standby. They deployed “exquisite capabilities” , classified surveillance systems capable of detecting heat signatures and electronic emissions to pinpoint the officer’s exact location in a mountainous crevice. They launched fighter jets, electronic warfare aircraft, MQ-9 Reaper drones, and rescue helicopters simultaneously, under the cover of darkness, and brought their man home .

A senior US official called it “the ultimate needle in a haystack.” But the American system is designed to find needles. The Nigerian system, as currently configured, seems designed to shrug.

The question is not whether Nigeria can afford such technology. The question is why we refuse to prioritize it. The US rescue operation succeeded because of three things Nigeria’s security apparatus lacks: integrated intelligence, real-time surveillance, and an unyielding commitment that no citizen will be left behind.

As retired US Army Captain Bishop C. Johnson wrote in a direct message to Nigeria: “In modern warfare, speed, precision, and coordination are no longer luxuries, they are decisive factors between success and catastrophic failure” . Where is that speed in Oyo? Where is that precision?

Question 2: Why Are Military Jets Flying Circles While the Air Force Refuses to Comb the Bushes?

Reports from Oyo indicate that “military jets fly sorties over the forests daily” and a “police helicopter is on standby” .

Let’s pause here. On standby?

The kidnappers are hiding in bushes, stationary targets with vulnerable hostages. Why is the air force conducting “sorties” (a term that suggests symbolic presence) instead of deploying combat helicopters equipped with thermal imaging to scan every square meter of those forests?

Why is the police helicopter on standby rather than in the air, transmitting real-time coordinates to troops on the ground?

Nigeria possesses combat aircraft. The Nigerian Air Force operates fighter jets and attack helicopters. Yet in virtually every kidnapping scenario, the pattern is the same: jets fly overhead (audible but ineffective), the kidnappers remain undetected, and weeks later, families pay ransoms.

Here is the uncomfortable truth: The military is not using its air power because it either lacks the tactical intelligence to know where to strike, the technological capability to distinguish hostages from hostage-takers from the air, or the operational will to risk collateral damage. Or perhaps all three.

The Chief of Army Staff announced in May 2026 that the Nigerian Army has acquired “additional protractor TP-2 drones” and other modern capabilities described as “force multipliers” for surveillance, target acquisition, and precision strikes . That is good news, on paper. But the announcement came on May 20. The Oyo kidnappings happened on May 15. Where were these drones five days earlier? Where are they now?

If these “force multipliers” exist, why are 46 Nigerians still in a forest, waiting for a ransom payment that will only fund the next kidnapping?

Question 3: What Are State Governors Doing With Their Security Allocations? (And Why Isn’t Lagos the Only One With an Answer)

Here is a question that should keep every state governor awake at night: You receive billions of naira annually for security. What have you bought?

Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu recently held a private breakfast with CEOs to raise funds for multipurpose security helicopters, drones, APCs, water cannons, smart CCTV cameras, and a rebuilt command and control center .

Note the key word: helicopters. Plural.

Lagos is not waiting for the federal government to secure Lagos. Lagos is acquiring its own aerial surveillance capability because its governor understands that you cannot fight modern criminals with colonial-era policing.

Zamfara State Governor Dauda Lawal, facing banditry in the Northwest, recently procured 25 Armoured Personnel Carriers, an 80-meter endurance surveillance drone capable of covering 50 kilometers and operating continuously for eight hours, 60 Hilux vehicles, 150 additional Hilux vehicles for security forces, and over 600 specialized motorcycles for rapid response in tough terrain .

The Defence Minister praised him. The troops received equipment. Progress, or at least effort, is visible.

Now ask yourself: What has your state governor bought?

The Oyo State Government is reportedly “coordinating efforts” with the Police, Military, and DSS . But where is the list of equipment purchased? Where are the drones? Where is the state-funded surveillance infrastructure?

Governor Seyi Makinde has promised not to spare resources, and he tweeted on Children’s Day that “our thoughts are with you” . Thoughts are good. Drones are better.

If a state like Zamfara, battling a full-blown banditry insurgency can acquire surveillance drones, why can’t Oyo? Why can’t Niger? Why can’t Kaduna? The answer, uncomfortable but necessary, is that many governors treat security allocations as slush funds, not war chests.

Question 4: Why Does the Nigeria Police, Charged With Internal Security Not Own a Single Operational Helicopter?

Let this sink in: The Nigeria Police Force, the primary agency responsible for protecting citizens from kidnapping and violent crime, does not have a dedicated fleet of surveillance helicopters.

In the Oyo kidnapping, a “police helicopter is on standby” . But a single helicopter, likely borrowed or chartered, is not a capability. It is a prop.

The police need their own aviation wing. Not one helicopter. A fleet. Equipped with thermal imaging, night-vision capability, and real-time data links to ground commanders. Deployed not days after a kidnapping but within hours.

The United States Marshals Service, FBI, and even major city police departments operate helicopters for manhunts. Why? Because criminals flee. Because aerial surveillance is the single most effective tool for locating hostages in remote terrain.

Nigeria’s kidnappers have learned that if they drag victims into bushes, the police effectively stop. They don’t have the air assets to find them. They don’t have the intelligence to track them. They don’t have the helicopters to pursue them. And the kidnappers know this. Which is why they keep taking victims into bushes. The police helicopter on standby in Oyo is better than nothing. But “better than nothing” is not a security strategy. It is an admission of defeat.

Question 5: Why Are We Still Building Police Stations That Look Like Abandoned Ruins?

While we are asking questions, let’s visit Bakono, a community in Nasarawa State.

In 2020, residents begged a federal lawmaker for a police station. Bandits had turned their lives into a nightmare; kidnappings, ransoms, corpses. The lawmaker nominated a N43.5 million project under the Zonal Intervention Programme .

Five years later, the building is a roofless, windowless carcass. No roof. No doors. No flooring. No visible electrical work. The contractor blames inflation and impassable roads. The lawmaker says he “did his job” by nominating it. The implementing agency, a water resources authority (!), claims it is 85 percent complete, a claim one civil engineer called “professional nonsense” .

Meanwhile, between 2022 and 2023, Bakono and neighboring communities paid approximately N50 million in ransoms to bandits .

A resident named Idris Yahaya put it simply: “Both the federal and state governments have neglected us and left us to our fate. The bandits know we have no protection” .

The police spokesperson later said the command was not even aware of the building project because no one had notified them .

So here is the picture: Federal money is allocated. A lawmaker claims credit. A contractor pockets millions. A police station remains unfinished for half a decade. Bandits collect ransoms. And when you ask who is responsible, everyone points at everyone else.

This is not a failure of security architecture. This is a failure of governance architecture. You cannot secure a country when the system for building police stations is broken, when lawmakers abandon projects after cutting ribbons (or, in this case, before even roofing the building), and when implementing agencies have no business implementing security infrastructure.

The Broader Catastrophe: Over 1,000 Abducted in Five Months

Let us zoom out from Oyo and Bakono to the national picture.

The Resource Centre for Human Rights and Civic Education (CHRICED) reported in April 2026 that more than 1,000 Nigerians have been abducted since January. That is not a statistic. That is 1,000 families shattered. 1,000 ransoms paid or unpaid. 1,000 stories of terror.

CHRICED’s executive director, Comrade Ibrahim Zikirullahi, warned that “the scale and persistence of kidnappings across multiple regions reflects a dangerous breakdown in national security architecture” and that the situation “now amounts to an undeclared war against citizens” .

The Northeast remains a hotspot with Boko Haram and ISWAP. The Northwest and North Central have been overrun by bandits running a “highly organized criminal economy driven by mass abductions, village raids, and ransom negotiations” .

And now the South-West, previously considered relatively safe, has joined the list, with Oyo becoming the latest theater of this undeclared war.

The opposition BOOT Party has accused President Bola Tinubu of “failing to secure Nigerians almost three years in office” . National Chairman Sonny Adenuga said: “Whatever Mr. President is doing, three years down the road, it is a shame on this government that for three good years they decided to be playing politics, even on issues of security” .

Whether you agree with the partisan framing or not, the underlying point is undeniable: whatever the current strategy is, it is not working.

Question 6: Where Is the Modern Warfare Doctrine?

Let’s close with the most fundamental question of all. Nigeria’s military is fighting 21st-century insurgents with what appears to be a 20th-century doctrine. The kidnappers use motorcycles, untraceable phones, and local informants. They hide in forests that have existed for centuries. They move at night. They blend into communities.

This is asymmetric warfare. And asymmetric warfare requires asymmetric responses. Where are the drones? Not the ones announced at conferences, but the ones deployed today over the forests of Oyo? The Chief of Army Staff says TP-2 drones have been acquired . Where are they? Why are they not in the air right now, transmitting thermal images to a command center that coordinates simultaneous ground assaults?

Where is the electronic surveillance? Kidnappers use phones to negotiate ransoms. Every phone call is a signal. Every signal can be traced. Why does it take weeks, sometimes months, to locate these criminals?

Where is the integrated command structure? The Oyo response involves “coordinating efforts” between the state government, Police, Military, and DSS . Coordination is not integration. Integration means a single commander with authority over all assets, air, ground, intelligence, operating from a unified command center.

Where is the night-fighting capability? The US rescue operation in Iran succeeded under cover of darkness because American forces own the night . Nigerian forces, by contrast, seem to operate primarily during daylight, giving kidnappers a 12-hour head start every single day.

Where is the political will? The most devastating question of all. Because if the political will existed, if the president declared that every kidnapped Nigerian would be rescued or avenged, that no ransom would be paid, that every asset would be committed, the security architecture would transform overnight.

The money exists. The technology exists. The personnel exist. What is missing is the national rage that demands answers and the presidential leadership that provides them.

Conclusion: The Architecture Is Not Broken, it Was Never Built

Here is the hard truth that no one wants to say out loud: Nigeria’s security architecture, as currently configured, was never designed to rescue kidnapped citizens from forests. It was designed for checkpoints, convoy movements, and reactive crisis management, not for intelligence-driven, technology-enabled hostage rescue operations.

The architecture that people have been made to believe is strong, effective, and reliable is a Potemkin village, impressive from a distance, hollow upon inspection.

The proof is in the results: Over 1,000 abducted in five months. Military jets circling impotently. A police helicopter on standby. A beheaded teacher’s body unrecovered. Children held in forests while adults negotiate ransoms. If this is strength, what would weakness look like?

The United States demonstrated in 72 hours what is possible when a nation refuses to abandon its citizens . Nigeria has demonstrated over decades what happens when a nation learns to tolerate the intolerable.

The question now is not whether the architecture can be fixed. It can. The question is whether Nigerians, citizens, governors, lawmakers, and the president, are finally angry enough to demand that it must be.

The families of the 46 victims in Oyo are waiting. The family of Michael Oyedokun, the beheaded teacher, is waiting for his body. And over 1,000 families from this year alone are waiting for justice.

How many more will have to wait before Nigeria stops asking for thoughts and starts demanding action?