Banner Online News

By Our Correspondent with reports from NewsNexus Research Desk

ABUJA — Delta State’s much-publicised claims of development, infrastructure spending and rising revenues have suffered a sobering reality check in the latest comparative assessment of Nigeria’s 36 states.

The 2025 Phillips Consulting State Performance Index (pSPI), the latest completed nationwide assessment available as of August 2026, places Delta 17th out of 36 states,  a decidedly mediocre position for one of Nigeria’s richest and highest-revenue states.

For a state blessed with enormous oil resources, substantial federal allocations and one of the country’s strongest economic bases, 17th position is hardly a record to celebrate.

Indeed, the Delta result raises a more uncomfortable question: if a state with Delta’s enormous resources can only manage a mid-table position, what exactly is being achieved with the resources at its disposal?

The 2025 pSPI, which gives 70 per cent weight to objective data and 30 per cent to citizens’ perceptions, does not merely measure the number of projects announced or commissioned. It looks at fiscal performance, economic indicators, infrastructure, public services and what citizens actually experience. And Delta’s verdict is blunt: strong revenue, but weak diversification. That single description exposes the central weakness of the state’s economic management.

Delta may have money. What it apparently lacks is the capacity to translate that financial advantage into sufficiently broad, sustainable and measurable development.

DELTA: RICH, BUT ONLY ORDINARY

Delta’s 17th position becomes even more troubling when viewed against the states ahead of it.

Lagos is first. Ogun is second. Kaduna third. Adamawa fourth. Niger fifth. Abia, a state that only recently occupied the bottom of the national table, is now 10th.

In other words, states with fewer structural advantages have demonstrated that improvement is possible. Delta, meanwhile, remains stuck in the middle.

The problem is not simply where Delta ranks. It is the enormous gap between what Delta possesses and what its ranking suggests it is achieving with what it possesses.

The pSPI identifies the state’s revenue strength but flags weak diversification. That is significant because a state cannot sustainably build its future merely by depending on oil-linked revenues and federal transfers.

A genuinely transformative administration should be judged by how effectively it converts temporary or externally derived revenue into productive economic capacity — industries, jobs, human capital, infrastructure, enterprise and a stronger non-oil economy.

On that measure, Delta still has a long way to go. And that is where the state’s 17th position becomes less a statistic and more an indictment of missed opportunity.

THE SOUTH-SOUTH: WHERE OIL WEALTH MEETS MEDIOCRITY

The wider South-South picture is hardly flattering. The six oil-producing states in the ranking occupy the following positions:

• Cross River — 14th
• Edo — 16th
• Delta — 17th
• Akwa Ibom — 21st
• Rivers — 25th
• Bayelsa — 29th

The message from these figures is unmistakable. The South-South remains one of Nigeria’s wealthiest regions in terms of natural resources, yet its collective performance does not reflect the magnitude of that wealth.

Cross River leads the zone at 14th, while Edo follows at 16th. Delta comes next at 17th. Akwa Ibom is 21st, Rivers 25th and Bayelsa a shocking 29th.

This is the South-South paradox in its starkest form: extraordinary natural wealth, but decidedly ordinary governance outcomes. The oil beneath the soil has not automatically translated into prosperity above it.

For decades, governments in the region have had access to enormous revenues. Yet the pSPI data suggest that the conversion of those revenues into sustainable economic development, efficient public services and improved citizen outcomes remains inadequate.

DELTA SHOULD BE ASKING QUESTIONS OF ITSELF

Delta’s situation deserves particular scrutiny because its ranking is not the result of extreme structural disadvantages. It is not Borno, battling a devastating insurgency. It is not Zamfara, overwhelmed by a security crisis. It is not Taraba, struggling to monetise vast but underdeveloped economic potential.

Delta is an oil-producing state with substantial revenue flows, strategic commercial locations, a large educated population, extensive agricultural potential and access to the Atlantic economic corridor. Yet it ranks 17th. That should provoke introspection rather than celebration.

A government cannot reasonably point to the existence of roads, flyovers, buildings, hospitals and other projects as proof of exceptional performance without asking whether those investments have produced a corresponding improvement in the economic and social lives of citizens.

The pSPI essentially asks that harder question. And Delta’s answer, at least for now, is underwhelming.

RIVERS: ANOTHER BIG REVENUE, SMALLER RESULT

Rivers provides another sobering example. Despite its enormous economic importance and vast oil resources, the state ranks 25th.

The pSPI describes Rivers as possessing huge economic potential but suffering from weak governance outcomes. That is an extraordinary contradiction for a state that sits at the heart of Nigeria’s oil economy.

Rivers should logically be among the country’s strongest performers. Instead, its ranking suggests that economic potential and actual governance performance remain far apart. The lesson is difficult to escape: having money is one thing; knowing what to do with it is another.

BAYELSA: FROM SIXTH TO 29TH

Bayelsa presents an even more devastating picture. The state plunged from sixth to 29th. That is not an ordinary decline. It is a governance warning.

Bayelsa possesses extraordinary oil wealth and receives substantial public revenue, yet the assessment indicates that the state’s economic potential has not translated into commensurate governance outcomes. The question is therefore unavoidable: what happened? How does an oil-rich state move from sixth position to 29th?

And, more importantly, what does such a collapse say about the sustainability of governance models built around revenue availability without corresponding institutional and economic transformation?

AKWA IBOM: BETTER, BUT STILL NOT ENOUGH

Akwa Ibom ranks 21st. The state performs relatively strongly in infrastructure investment, but the overall ranking still places it in the lower half of the national table.

For a state renowned for substantial federal allocations and oil revenues, 21st position again exposes the gap between financial resources and overall performance. Infrastructure alone cannot be the final measure of governance.

A state must also create productive economic opportunities, strengthen internally generated revenue, improve public services and ensure that citizens actually experience the benefits of government spending.

ANAMBRA: THE SOUTH-EAST SHOCKER

If the South-South demonstrates the danger of assuming that oil wealth automatically produces good governance, Anambra demonstrates the danger of assuming that entrepreneurial culture automatically produces effective government. Anambra ranks an astonishing 34th out of 36 states.

Only Kogi and Borno rank lower. That is perhaps one of the most startling outcomes in the entire assessment.

Anambra is home to Onitsha, one of West Africa’s great commercial centres; Nnewi, a renowned industrial and entrepreneurial hub; and a population celebrated nationally for enterprise, commerce and private-sector ingenuity.

Yet the state has fallen from 8th to 34th. That is a collapse of 26 places. The irony is almost painful. The people have demonstrated what private initiative can accomplish. The state government, however, appears unable to convert that enormous economic energy into a correspondingly strong public-sector performance.

The pSPI points to weaknesses in security, infrastructure investment and public-service delivery despite Anambra’s considerable economic potential. That contradiction deserves much more than political spin.

If a state populated by some of Nigeria’s most celebrated entrepreneurs can rank 34th in governance performance, then the problem is clearly not a lack of economic ingenuity among its people. It is a problem of governance.

ABIA: THE HUMILIATING COMPARISON

And then comes the comparison that should make Anambra’s leadership particularly uncomfortable.

Abia has moved from 36th to 10th.

That is a 26-place leap — the largest positive movement recorded in the assessment.

The same South-East region that produced Anambra’s spectacular decline has produced Abia’s spectacular turnaround.

Ebonyi ranks 13th, while Enugu is 20th.

Imo is 31st.

Anambra is 34th.

The contrast is impossible to ignore.

It demonstrates that the South-East’s problems are not simply the result of geography, insecurity, federal policy or an inhospitable business environment.

Governance choices matter.

Leadership matters.

Institutional discipline matters.

And, most importantly, what a government does with available opportunities matters.

THE SOUTH-SOUTH NEEDS A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION

For the South-South, the pSPI should trigger a fundamental rethink.

The region cannot continue to measure progress principally by the size of federal allocations, the number of projects commissioned or the volume of oil revenue received.

The real question is what remains when the political ceremonies end.

How many sustainable jobs have been created?

How much has the non-oil economy expanded?

How much has internally generated revenue improved?

How efficient are public hospitals and schools?

How good are the roads beyond showcase corridors?

How secure are communities?

How much value is being generated by agriculture, manufacturing and small businesses?

And, ultimately, do ordinary citizens believe their lives are getting significantly better?

Those are the questions the pSPI forces governments to confront.

THE REAL DELTA TEST

Delta’s 17th position should therefore not be dismissed as merely another league-table statistic.

It should be treated as a warning.

A state with Delta’s resources should not be content with being average.

If Lagos can turn its economic advantages into the country’s number-one overall ranking, and Ogun can leverage its industrial proximity to occupy second place, while Adamawa, Niger and Abia dramatically improve their positions, Delta has little justification for complacency.

The state’s challenge is no longer simply how to raise more revenue.

It is how to convert revenue into sustainable prosperity.

That means diversification beyond oil, stronger institutions, better public services, productive infrastructure, investment in human capital and an economic environment in which private enterprise can flourish without government having to do everything itself.

The same applies to Rivers, Bayelsa and Akwa Ibom.

THE VERDICT

The latest national performance data have stripped away much of the political theatre surrounding state governance.

They show that wealth does not guarantee performance, publicity does not equal development and project commissioning does not automatically mean transformation.

Delta’s 17th position is therefore not a disaster — but for a state with its enormous resources and potential, it is undeniably disappointing.

Rivers at 25th and Bayelsa at 29th are even more troubling.

And Anambra’s 34th position, following a spectacular fall from eighth, is perhaps the most embarrassing contradiction of all.

Meanwhile, Abia’s leap from 36th to 10th offers a powerful counterargument to every government that blames structural disadvantages for poor performance.

The lesson from the data is brutally simple:

Resources provide an opportunity. They do not provide an excuse.

Governors should therefore stop asking citizens to judge them by the number of projects they commission or the size of the budgets they announce.

The harder — and more meaningful — question is this:

For every naira available to government, how much measurable improvement did citizens actually receive?

Until that question is answered convincingly, Delta and the wider South-South cannot reasonably claim to have converted their extraordinary wealth into extraordinary governance.

Full text of the Report:

HOW NIGERIA’S 36 GOVERNORS RANK: THE DATA BEHIND STATE PERFORMANCE IN 2026

By NewsNexus Research Desk

ABUJA — Who is actually performing in Nigeria’s 36 states?

Beyond political propaganda, commissioned projects, social-media campaigns and competing claims by governors and their supporters, the latest comprehensive national data provide a basis for comparing the performance of state governments.

The 2025 pcl. State Performance Index (pSPI) by Phillips Consulting remains the latest completed national comparative assessment. The 2026 pSPI was launched in July 2026, but its full state-by-state results are not yet publicly available. Phillips Consulting says the index evaluates states against their own potential and citizens’ lived experience, using multiple economic, governance, infrastructure and citizen-perception indicators.

The 2025 assessment therefore provides the most complete evidence currently available for comparing all 36 states.

Importantly, the pSPI uses a revised methodology that places 70 per cent weight on objective data and 30 per cent on citizen perception. It incorporates audited financial information, economic indicators, infrastructure and public-service outcomes alongside a nationwide citizen survey.

THE 36-STATE RANKING

Rank| State| Governor| NewsNexus reading

1| Lagos| Babajide Sanwo-Olu| Exceptional economic/fiscal performance

2| Ogun| Dapo Abiodun| Strong industrial and fiscal performance

3| Kaduna| Uba Sani| Strong governance and fiscal reform

4| Adamawa| Ahmadu Fintiri| Major improvement

5| Niger| Mohammed Umar Bago| Major improvement/investment drive

6| Nasarawa| Abdullahi Sule| Strong objective performance

7| Gombe| Muhammadu Inuwa Yahaya| Strong citizen perception

8| Jigawa| Umar Namadi| Strong citizen confidence

9| Plateau| Caleb Mutfwang| Strong overall performance

10| Abia| Alex Otti| Most dramatic improvement

11| Oyo| Seyi Makinde| Strong mid-to-upper-tier performance

12| Bauchi| Bala Mohammed| Strong North-East performer

13| Ebonyi| Francis Nwifuru| Strong infrastructure/citizen indicators

14| Cross River| Bassey Otu| Strong citizen/service indicators

15| Kebbi| Nasir Idris| Strong citizen satisfaction, weak fiscal base

16| Edo| Monday Okpebholo| Strong revenue, weaker service outcomes

17| Delta| Sheriff Oborevwori| Strong revenue, weak diversification

18| Kwara| AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq| Strong revenue, mixed citizen satisfaction

19| Yobe| Mai Mala Buni| Resilient but structurally constrained

20| Enugu| Peter Mbah| Strong capital investment, business-climate concerns

21| Akwa Ibom| Umo Eno| Strong infrastructure investment

22| Osun| Ademola Adeleke| Mid-table performance

23| Benue| Hyacinth Alia| Significant potential, weak fiscal capacity

24| Taraba| Agbu Kefas| Resource-rich but revenue/service gaps

25| Rivers| Siminalayi Fubara| Huge economic potential, weak governance outcomes

26| Ekiti| Biodun Oyebanji| Strong revenue indicators, limited capital spending

27| Ondo| Lucky Aiyedatiwa| Strong revenue potential, weak citizen outcomes

28| Zamfara| Dauda Lawal| Security crisis overwhelms economic potential

29| Bayelsa| Douye Diri| Major decline despite oil wealth

30| Kano| Abba Kabir Yusuf| Major decline; fiscal and service challenges

31| Imo| Hope Uzodimma| Weak overall performance despite revenue potential

32| Katsina| Dikko Radda| Security and economic constraints

33| Sokoto| Ahmad Aliyu| Low fiscal and service performance

34| Anambra| Chukwuma Soludo| Sharp decline despite strong economic potential

35| Kogi| Ahmed Usman Ododo| Very weak service and governance indicators

36| Borno| Babagana Zulum| Severe structural/security constraints

 

The first ten positions are directly confirmed by the published 2025 pSPI reporting, while the complete state profiles and subsequent regional analyses provide the remaining positions

THE TOP FIVE: WHAT THE NUMBERS REALLY SAY

 

1.⁠ ⁠BABAJIDE SANWO-OLU — LAGOS

Lagos remains Nigeria’s strongest overall state performer.

The pSPI places Lagos first out of the 36 states, with a five-star rating. Its economic strength is unparalleled: IGR per capita, IGR per square kilometre and IGR per trade route all rank first nationally, while 69 per cent of total revenue comes from IGR.

This is arguably the strongest evidence of fiscal independence among Nigerian states.

But Lagos also demonstrates why economic size must not be confused with quality of governance.

The state’s debt per capita ranks last nationally in the pSPI dataset, while citizen satisfaction with several basic services remains disappointing. Phillips Consulting therefore describes Lagos as a state where enormous economic power has not translated proportionately into world-class public services.

NewsNexus verdict: Nigeria’s strongest economic and fiscal performer, but with a significant public-service and cost-of-living challenge.

2.⁠ ⁠DAPO ABIODUN — OGUN

Ogun occupies second place.

Its biggest advantage is its transformation into one of Nigeria’s most important industrial corridors.

The state benefits from its proximity to Lagos, extensive manufacturing activity, expanding logistics networks and a growing private-sector economy.

The pSPI gives Ogun an Exceptional 5-Star rating.

But there is a major qualification.

Economic performance has not translated proportionately into citizen satisfaction.

That makes Ogun one of Nigeria’s clearest examples of the difference between economic growth and inclusive development.

NewsNexus verdict: One of Nigeria’s strongest economic-development administrations, but public-service delivery must catch up with industrial growth

3.⁠ ⁠UBA SANI — KADUNA

Kaduna’s third position is particularly significant.

Unlike Lagos and Ogun, Kaduna operates in a much more difficult security environment.

Yet the state ranks third nationally.

Kaduna’s strengths include fiscal management, governance reforms and transparency. The state also performed strongly in independent fiscal-transparency assessments.

The Q3 2025 States Fiscal Transparency League Table, for example, placed Kaduna among the states scoring 100 per cent on the assessed transparency requirements.

NewsNexus verdict: The strongest overall northern governance performer in the pSPI, although security and citizen-service outcomes remain major challenges.

4.⁠ ⁠AHMADU FINTIRI — ADAMAWA

Adamawa may have the most impressive improvement story among the northern states.

The state moved from 26th to fourth.

That is a 22-place improvement.

The significance is that Adamawa does not have the economic advantages of Lagos or Ogun.

Its rise therefore suggests that improvements in governance can occur even where structural economic constraints are severe.

The state also achieved 100 per cent in the Q3 2025 fiscal-transparency league table.

NewsNexus verdict: One of Nigeria’s strongest examples of governance improvement relative to starting conditions.

5.⁠ ⁠MOHAMMED UMAR BAGO — NIGER

Niger State moved from 29th to fifth, representing a 24-place improvement.

Bago’s administration has pursued an ambitious agricultural and infrastructure agenda.

The state’s enormous landmass, agricultural resources and proximity to Abuja give it considerable economic potential.

The challenge is turning agricultural projects into productive value chains, processing industries, employment and sustainable internally generated revenue.

NewsNexus verdict: One of the country’s biggest turnaround stories, but the sustainability of the agricultural model will determine whether the improvement lasts.

THE MOST IMPROVED GOVERNORS

Three governors stand out dramatically when performance is measured by movement from the previous ranking:

🥇 Alex Otti — Abia

36th → 10th

+26 places

🥈 Mohammed Umar Bago — Niger

29th → 5th

+24 places

🥉 Ahmadu Fintiri — Adamawa

26th → 4th

+22 places

Phillips Consulting specifically identified these states among the biggest movers in the latest assessment.

This is arguably more revealing than simply looking at the top three.

A state that moves from 36th to 10th may demonstrate a greater rate of institutional improvement than a wealthy state that remains first because of structural advantages.

THE BIGGEST DECLINES

The opposite side of the ranking is equally important.

BAYELSA — 6th → 29th

Bayelsa recorded one of the most dramatic falls.

The state possesses enormous oil wealth, yet the pSPI indicates that its economic potential has not translated into commensurate governance outcomes.

KANO — 7th → 30th

Kano’s decline is particularly significant because it is one of Nigeria’s historic commercial centres.

A state with Kano’s population, trading networks and industrial history should theoretically be one of Nigeria’s leading economic performers.

Its position therefore represents a major warning about the consequences of weak fiscal and institutional performance.

ANAMBRA — 8th → 34th

Anambra is arguably the most striking contradiction.

It possesses Onitsha, Nnewi, a powerful entrepreneurial culture and a substantial commercial base.

Yet the pSPI places it 34th.

The assessment points to weaknesses in security, infrastructure investment and public-service delivery despite the state’s substantial economic potential.

WHAT ABOUT TARABA?

Taraba occupies 24th position.

This is an important result for a state with enormous natural-resource and agricultural potential.

The pSPI identifies Taraba’s strengths in:

– natural resources;

– agriculture and livestock;

– functional basic education infrastructure;

– economic opportunities.

But the weaknesses are substantial.

Taraba ranks 36th in IGR per square kilometre, 36th in IGR per trade route, and 31st in IGR as a share of total revenue. Only about 10 per cent of state revenue comes from IGR.

Citizen satisfaction is also weak in several areas.

Only 13 per cent of surveyed residents expressed satisfaction with road quality, while satisfaction with healthcare affordability was only 24 per cent.

At the same time, Taraba ranks first nationally in functional basic education facilities per population and fourth in affordability of public primary and secondary education.

This produces an interesting paradox:

«Taraba has enormous economic potential and some strong social indicators, but weak fiscal mobilisation and poor infrastructure prevent that potential from translating into a high overall ranking.»

NewsNexus verdict: Taraba is not a state without potential; it is a state where potential is significantly under-monetised.

THE SOUTH-SOUTH PARADOX

The South-South provides perhaps the clearest evidence that natural resources do not automatically produce good governance.

The 2025 ranking places:

– Cross River — 14th

– Edo — 16th

– Delta — 17th

– Akwa Ibom — 21st

– Rivers — 25th

– Bayelsa — 29th

Regional analysis of the pSPI describes the South-South as a zone with enormous wealth but inadequate conversion of resources into broad-based development.

This is particularly striking in Delta, Rivers and Bayelsa.

The region’s oil wealth should provide a significant fiscal advantage.

Yet the results demonstrate that revenue availability is not the same thing as governance effectiveness.

THE NORTH-WEST PROBLEM

The North-West’s ranking is equally revealing.

Only Kaduna and Jigawa make the national top 10.

The rest are:

– Kano — 30th

– Katsina — 32nd

– Sokoto — 33rd

– Kebbi — 15th

– Zamfara — 28th.

Jigawa is the region’s most interesting case because it ranks 8th nationally and first in citizen perception.

Kano, meanwhile, falls to 30th, despite its enormous population, commercial history and industrial potential.

This indicates a structural problem:

political importance has not translated into equivalent economic and institutional performance.

THE SOUTH-EAST CONTRADICTION

The South-East also produces a striking pattern:

State| Rank

Abia| 10th

Ebonyi| 13th

Enugu| 20th

Imo| 31st

Anambra| 34th

The region has some of Nigeria’s strongest entrepreneurial cultures, yet three of its five states rank outside the top 20.

Abia is the exception.

Its move from 36th to 10th is the largest positive movement in the national ranking.

WHAT THE 36-STATE DATA TEACH US

The ranking exposes five important realities about Nigerian governance.

1.⁠ ⁠MONEY MATTERS — BUT MONEY ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH

Lagos has extraordinary revenue capacity.

But its citizen satisfaction does not correspond proportionately to its wealth.

2.⁠ ⁠RESOURCE WEALTH CAN HIDE GOVERNANCE FAILURE

Bayelsa, Rivers and Delta demonstrate this problem.

Oil wealth does not automatically produce strong institutions.

3.⁠ ⁠SMALLER STATES CAN OUTPERFORM WEALTHIER STATES

Jigawa, Gombe, Nasarawa and Plateau show that states with smaller economic bases can perform strongly when resources are deployed more effectively.

4.⁠ ⁠TURNAROUND MATTERS

Abia, Adamawa and Niger demonstrate that measuring improvement over time can be as important as measuring absolute performance.

5.⁠ ⁠CITIZEN EXPERIENCE MATTERS

The pSPI’s 30 per cent citizen-perception component is important because a government should ultimately be judged by whether people experience improvements in their daily lives.

AN IMPORTANT METHODOLOGICAL WARNING

NewsNexus does not present the pSPI ranking as an infallible declaration of the “best” and “worst” governors.

Different indices measure different things.

For example, BudgIT’s 2025 State of States focuses primarily on fiscal sustainability, revenue generation, capital expenditure and debt. Its ranking is therefore substantially different from pSPI. BudgIT’s methodology specifically examines how states finance their budgets, grow internally generated revenue, invest in human capital and manage borrowing.

The 2025 BudgIT fiscal assessment places states differently from the pSPI, illustrating why one index should not be used as the sole basis for judging governance.

The pSPI itself says it is designed as a diagnostic and benchmarking tool, rather than merely a league table.

NEWSNEXUS FINAL ASSESSMENT

Based on the latest completed nationwide pSPI assessment, the governors can broadly be grouped as follows:

🟢 EXCEPTIONAL / NATIONAL LEADERS

Babajide Sanwo-Olu — Lagos

Dapo Abiodun — Ogun

🟢 STRONG NATIONAL PERFORMERS

Uba Sani — Kaduna

Ahmadu Fintiri — Adamawa

Mohammed Umar Bago — Niger

Abdullahi Sule — Nasarawa

🟢 STRONG / ABOVE-AVERAGE

Inuwa Yahaya — Gombe

Umar Namadi — Jigawa

Caleb Mutfwang — Plateau

Alex Otti — Abia

Seyi Makinde — Oyo

Bala Mohammed — Bauchi

Francis Nwifuru — Ebonyi

Bassey Otu — Cross River

Nasir Idris — Kebbi

🟡 MIXED PERFORMANCE

Monday Okpebholo — Edo

Sheriff Oborevwori — Delta

AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq — Kwara

Mai Mala Buni — Yobe

Peter Mbah — Enugu

Umo Eno — Akwa Ibom

Ademola Adeleke — Osun

Hyacinth Alia — Benue

Agbu Kefas — Taraba

Siminalayi Fubara — Rivers

Biodun Oyebanji — Ekiti

Lucky Aiyedatiwa — Ondo

🔴 UNDERPERFORMING / MAJOR REFORM REQUIRED

Dauda Lawal — Zamfara

Douye Diri — Bayelsa

Abba Kabir Yusuf — Kano

Hope Uzodimma — Imo

Dikko Radda — Katsina

Ahmad Aliyu — Sokoto

Chukwuma Soludo — Anambra

Ahmed Usman Ododo — Kogi

Babagana Zulum — Borno

This categorisation should be understood as a reading of the pSPI ranking, not an independent NewsNexus score.

THE NEWSNEXUS CONCLUSION

The most important lesson from Nigeria’s 36-state governance data is that the best governor is not necessarily the governor who spends the most money, commissions the most projects or controls the largest revenue base.

The stronger question is:

«How effectively does a governor convert the resources, opportunities and constraints inherited from his predecessor into measurable improvements in the lives of citizens?»

On that basis, Lagos, Ogun and Kaduna remain the national benchmark, while Adamawa, Niger and Abia deserve particular attention for the scale of their improvement.

But the data also expose serious contradictions.

A state can be rich and underperform.

A state can be poor and improve rapidly.

A state can have high citizen satisfaction but weak fiscal performance.

And a state can have strong audited numbers while citizens remain dissatisfied.

That is why the next generation of Nigerian governance assessment should move beyond “How many projects were commissioned?” to a more demanding question:

“How much measurable development did citizens receive for every naira available to government?”

That is the standard against which Nigeria’s governors should ultimately be judged.

Source base: Phillips Consulting 2025 State Performance Index; Phillips Consulting state-level pSPI profiles; BudgIT State of States 2025; States Fiscal Transparency League Table; NBS and other referenced public datasets. The 2026 pSPI has been launched but its complete national results are not yet publicly available, so the 2025 pSPI remains the latest completed 36-state comparative benchmark as of August 13, 2026.